
The root at what has made Twitter an internet craze is not just micro-blogging. It's not JUST "that it keeps us connected" or "that I can market my business."
Twitter is big because it is instant. Twitter is hot because it allows us to be voyeurs. Twitter is changing the world because it is a platform of social equality. And MOST IMPORTANTLY, Twitter is HUGE because it has created Micro Fame.
MICRO FAME
This is what it all boils down to. The psychology of having followers. Whether this key word was thought up by a team of brainstormers or if it just popped out of someone's mind on a Thursday afternoon between bites of their tuna sandwich, the idea of having FOLLOWERS is revolutionary. These are not FRIENDS, like in Facebook (which are never really your friends, anyway) these are people who are following everything you do.
Tying in with the human instincts of selfishness and greed, the struggle for fame, significance, and individualism plays a major role in every person's daily life. But it has never been so easy to feel famous until now.
On Twitter there are people with 2,000 followers. That's 2,000 people who care about what that Twitterer might say today. Two thousand people who might respond to an insightful "tweet." Two thousand people who might TALK, BLOG, or RE-TWEET about what this one Twitterer says.
This kind of audience has allowed for Word of Mouth Marketing (read Andy Sernovitz's book and blog) to become the most powerful method of activism, advertising, and success in business.
But it doesn't take 2,000 followers to feel like you're making a difference. Even if you have 2 followers you can be heard. You can take part in the conversation of people you wouldn't normally be able to speak to in real life (i.e. people who are famous outside of Twitter). And most likely, they will speak back to you. Making you feel even more important than ever.
Even a person like myself who only has about 500 followers feels famous. At one point I caught myself "thanking my 100th follower." As if they were a fan. As if they followed me because I am important. As if what I say matters. When you see people thanking their followers for any reason it becomes clear that their mentality has been affected. They are already in the Micro Fame mode. They are already assuming that everyone who follows them is a fan of theirs (where in many cases people follow each other because one of them followed them first).
And that's okay. Because part of what makes Twitter so great is that it makes you feel good. It's okay to feel like you are famous and that what you say matters. Because it does matter. And you deserve to be heard.
It is only a matter of time before everyone gets their 100th or 500th or 2,000th follower, because in the end everyone on Twitter is connected. Yes, some people reach those numbers faster than others because of different aspects of their social life (i.e. they are on a tv show or they are a presidential candidate) but in the end it does not make anyone more important that the next person.
Twitter is not only satisfying INSTINCTIVE impulses (i.e. the selfishness of being famous, the greed of wanting instant results, the need to speak and be heard, the freedom and equality in being able to take part in a conversation no matter your economic or social status) but Twitter is making each and every person who uses the medium to feel IMPORTANT.
The power of Micro Fame has created a psychological feeling of presence on Twitter.
(And conversely it has created a feeling of dependence. Twitter is a drug. And we are slowly becoming addicted. Only difference, however, is that this drug has produced a whole lot of good and there's no stopping it now.)
Do you agree? COMMENT!
April 28, 2008
The Psychology Behind Twitter
Posted by
Alana
at
3:33 PM
Labels: greed, micro fame, psychology, twitter
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
Alana, excellent! excellent! excellent^(insert huge number) post! I could not have said it better myself. Really well written and I completely agree.
It really does open the horizons for people especially if you use twitter efficiently and effectively to connect with people as opposed to using it as a sheer promotional tool for yourself.
Jeff
I agree Alana. Twitter is finally delivering on th promise of Web 2.0. A college student, a Presidential Candidate, a TV personality, all have the same 140 characters to get their idea across. If you make smart, constructive posts, people will seek you out in blogs, websites, shows etc.
Wow Alana. That was one of your best articles yet. Excellent job! :-D *retweets it*
And I happen to agree with you, although the putting it in the light of all of us being selfish attention seekers leaves a bit of a bad taste. We all like to think we're not like that. It's not necessarily a bad thing though. :-D I will probably thank my 100th follower. More because I am astounded that 100 people thought my random ramblings are interesting enough to follow. Honestly what are these people thinking? *lol*
Keep up the insightful posts Alana. This is why I follow you. ;-)
Chris
Great post Alana! I was thinking about this the other day, trying to figure out why I was so addicted to Twitter. I <3 my followers! This is @mlenelson, by the way.
I love your style of writing Alana, it sort of reminds me of my one of my favorite bloggers/writers/entrepreneurs Seth Godin.
A well thought out and nicely written post on Twitter. I'm currently approaching my 100th follower on Twitter, and will thank him or her as well (it could be you, follow me, I'm unleashvideo), knowing full well that it's kinda crazy to do so.
Keep up the good posts, songs, and reporting!
P.S. When can I expect to buy an autographed shirt from you? ;)
Yup it's neat, I followed @snowbear a few days ago from someone else who mentioned him and I liked his wit. And thru that now I find you Alana, a fellow geek diva and you're neat, smart and fun too.
I am amazed at the fact that I get more @ replies to random babbles that I thought no one would be interested in, and no response sometimes to stuff I really found interesting or questions I couldn't figure out myself. I'm guessing I've not reached my tipping point on followers for that yet.
We'll see!
:) @funDivaChristy
While Twitter is not the first to utilize the following concept, they were certainly able to capitalize on the concept in the most effective manner. Take LiveJournal for example and their 'friends' and 'friends of' social connections. Good idea, didn't do much. The broadcast medium is certainly a more suitable approach.
Here's an idea to look deeper into Twitter. Currently, I do not have a fancy iPhone or even an unlimited data plan despite my involvement is this crazy tech world. Therefore, I confine myself to web updates and following. How much does the Twitter experience change when using mobile devices, etc?
Julava, I would say that using a phone is essential to becoming sucked into Twitter. Again, it is about the need to get things when you want them (ie. Instantaneously). This also fuels the dependence.
Although I think Twitter would be successful without the phone, the mobile aspect is a HUGE vehicle for it's widespread addiction.
Twitter is super addicitive and I really have not started to realize it full potential yet.
I really want to get my blog off the ground and I hope to have more interested people reading my eassys versus livejournal where the audience was completely limited.
What is it with these people trying to acquire as many followers as possible, but not having an interest in following others.
Diggnation's Alex Albrect is offering a bribe to get 20,000 followers, but then he only follows 18. So it's only about the number of followers to him. It's a one way conversation.
Alana follows as many people that follow her, over 600.
I am guilty of being affected by the "micro fame" that Twitter has brought me. However modest, however niche, it has created so many new opportunities for me.
In the past five months, my professional network has grown beyond my wildest imagination, and the more people who "follow," the more I become convinced of the value of my contribution to the global conversation. But -- and I believe this wholeheartedly -- no more valuable than anyone else's contribution; that's what's so incredible about it. Twitter is the great equalizer.
Great article, though I caught the re-tweet and I am proud to have been your 1000th follower! Maybe it meant more to me than it did to you?!
I agree with a lot of what you say, but not the places where you play down the importance of having a huge following. I followed you because friends said you had an original voice, and I agreed with them. I think this means that anyone with 1000 followers is saying important things, although I accept that when people see huge numbers they must think 'gee, this person has such a large following I'd be an idiot not to join the crowd'... and this is the mentality that makes anyone famous, whether that person is Madonna or Alana Taylor.
One thing Twitter is good at is creating 'fame' out of a much smaller following than before Web 2.0, but I don't necessarily agree with people who argue that Twitter is therefore 'delivering' on the Web 2.0 promise, which let's face it is full of hype just like dot-com was.
Twitter has huge architectural issues, and it doesn't (yet) have a business model. It's just neat.
I'm writing this from Kobe harbour in Japan, and yes, I'm going to tweet that!
It's funny, because as many followers as I have (17 now, used to have hundreds), I hate pretty much all but 1 (who I know personally). And I let them know that too! They're all so fucking useless and uninteresting. I occasionally will say "My follwers are dumbfucks" or "I really fucking hate my followers." Haha, I love it! Twitter is really just attention whoring, and your article did a lot to prove that. Not sure if it meant to, though...
By the way, if anyone wants to surprise me with something meaningful to say: http://www.twitter.com/kirishima
Wow, this was very insight Alana, and I agree wholeheartedly about the psychology of mini-fame and how even one follower makes one feel heard. And it even helps the idea further with @replies and direct messages. But also the opposite occurs when one doesn't respond or heaven forbid, someone un-follows you.
Alana,
Wow. Nothing personal, but I'm going to take the alternative point of view here and whole-heartedly disagree.
I can see the inherent value of having instantaneous access to information, contacts, etc.
But looking to external sources for validation and approval is treading on dangerous territory, my dear.
Yes, celebrity (e.g. MIRO FAME) is addictive. It makes you "feel good". However, all addictions are inherently bad news for the psyche. How sustainable is celebrity? Do you "need" it to feel valued?
Think about how many celebrities spiral into depression when their celebrity status begins to fade. Their sense of value and self worth is sometimes so dependent on their fame - on the approval of others - that when it's gone many feel worthless and can go into a deep depressions that they never come out of.
Bottom line: You must have an internal sense of value and self worth, and take Twitter only for what it is - a communication tool for staying in touch, making contacts, gaining access to information and it's marketing potential.
Would love to hear others' thoughts...
:0)
Thanks for the insight. As I read on another blog to paraphrase all this with emails, pda, cell phone is send/receive messages, not a conversation.
Check out my article on the psychology of twitter - http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-tao-innovation/200903/understanding-the-psychology-twitter
Wow this is so true. I'm obsessed with my twitter!
Post a Comment