Read it here. (And tell me if they actually make legitimate arguments other than "blah blah blah she thinks she knows everything..."). Oh, and keep in mind that the whole thing is written by a person who refers to themselves as a...
A person, who according to their "about me" made a career out of posting comments to TechCrunch.
Businessman, technology pioneer, media mogul, marketing visionary, scientist, artist, philosopher, diplomat, mentor, confidant, connoisseur, adventurer, lover, fighter, womanizer, son, father (currently under dispute), friend. Drama 2.0 is the Internet’s version of Keyser Söze.
The best part is where they write: "After all, if she had spent less time tweeting, “managing” her blog, singing songs about Twitter and generally serving as a “social media maven,” it’s possible that she would have spent more time investigating the curriculum of the universities she was interested in attending."
This is coming from a person (persons?) who refers to themselves as Drama 2.0 and makes a living "as the internet's version of Keyser Soze."
HAHAHA.
Very entertaining, I must say.
Posts
3 comments:
I think Drama 2.0 is chicken shit for not even revealing his/her identity.
I used to actually enjoy his cynical views on web 2.0. Now its like a broken record.
I absolutely love people who call themselves gurus, mavens, moguls, and visionaries. Did Einstein ever call himself a visionary?
Usually those who say they are, aren't.
I'm so not cool.
Just read the Drama 2.0 article. I don't use this term much, but what a douchebag of an article.
Post a Comment